>>102841
What ? Since when are we talking about religious freedom ?
We were talking about that I thought that they disappointed me with simplifying the whole persecution over the burning of Rome and how the the other guy was fine with that because of his own reasons. Religion came up for a different reason.
Also, I'm a moral relativists and I always ask people to see it from perspective of the people they're judging, but there is stuff that you know is universally bad, no matter the times or traditions, like persecutions and killing.
Hell, if you argue that what Nero did wasn't evil, how about we celebrate the Crusades and the Holocaust ? There are no grey areas there. There was no motivation with tradition or religion to do something morally ambiguous. There wasn't a war based on complicated and ancient animosities between two nations with culture different than ours. He was simply throwing people to lions to save his own ass.
Why do I even have to explain this to you ? The guy behind mini-holocaust = bad.